Introduction
A few years back, we sent a message to a
number of our Strategic
Intelligence colleagues requesting that
they give us their opinions on what the
“analysis” process is. In the message, we stated
that since the “911” terrorists act, there has
been a lot of discussion concerning the
importance of analysis. We indicated that
analysis is important to our government and to
people, like us, who create intelligence. We
further stated that we view analysis as a process where one
engages in many of the following activities,
in any order: observe, classify, count,
compare, ask questions, role play (engage in
war games, do scenarios, use simulation
technology, etc.), and take action. We
emphasized that we consider role playing to be
very important in arriving at the intelligence
that's so important to the intelligence user. We
then requested that our colleagues give us their
opinions on the "analysis" process.
A Discussion of the Responses
We sent out approximately 1000 requests for
an opinion. We received almost 150 responses.
Most of the respondents are, or were, involved
in some facet of business information analysis
for strategic purposes. About forty-one percent
of the respondents indicated that our definition
was fine, or they told us, or implied, that our
definition was fine, but needs some
modification.
About thirty-eight percent said or implied that
analysis is the use of some methodology or
technique to, first, find relationships between
different pieces of information, and then draw
inferences from the relationships. Some fifteen
percent of the respondents said or implied that
analysis is a process where one converts
information into actionable intelligence. And
approximately six percent said or implied that
analysis is a process where one asks, or
answers, the “So What?” question.
Some of the your-definition-is-fine-but
respondents said that “take action” shouldn't be
part of the analysis process. They said that
“take action” should come after the analysis is
completed. Some of the
your-definition-is-fine-but respondents
indicated that drawing inferences is an
important part of analysis. And some of these
respondents felt that synthesizing is an
important addition to my definition.
Other
respondents felt that drawing conclusions and
making recommendations were important elements
in the analysis process. Some of the
respondents indicated that “purpose” should be
added to my definition. Below are samples from
the your-definition-is-fine-but responses.
(Many of the sample responses in the
different categories below are paraphrased.)
Sample Responses
for "Your Definition is Fine, But"
Your definition is fine, but “take action”
should be replaced with “predicts,”
“recommends,” etc.
Your definition is fine, but analysis also
includes: forecasting, visioning, planning,
strategizing, challenging data, communicating
and taking action.
Your definition is fine, but it should include,
synthesis, determining usefulness and looking at
a competitor’s profiles.
Your definition is fine, but you should add
“intuition.”
Your definition is fine, but you should add
things like “interpret” “organize” and
“document.” And “take action” should become
“recommendations” or “next steps.”
Your definition is fine, except doing things in
a “linear and nonlinear” way is important. And
the activities should give you some insight into
the future.
Your definition is fine, except, establishing
objectives is the first thing one should do.
Your definition is fine. However, pattern
recognition should be added. It helps one find
early warnings.
Your definition is fine. Analysis is more of an
art than a science. Analysis is like math. The
more you do it, the better you become.
As we indicated
above, there are approximately thirty-eight
percent of the respondents who said or implied
that analysis is the use of some methodology
or technique to find relationships between
different pieces of information and draw
inferences. Below are samples of the comments.
Sample Responses
for Analysis is “The Use of Some Methodology or
Technique”
Analysis is the use of some methodology to
dissolve information to find trends and
patterns.
Analysis is the use of some methodology to
identify gaps and “inconsistencies to find
synergies and trends.”
Analysis is the use of some methodology to
synthesize quantitative and qualitative
information to find the truth.
Analysis is the use of some methodology to
uncover “insights, implications, and
intelligence.”
Analysis is the use of some methodology to
decompose a situation or problem into its
components.
Analysis is the use of some methodology to do
“pattern recognition.”
Analysis is customer driven, all source,
collegial, and actionable.
Analysis is like “doing a jigsaw puzzle.” As you
put the pieces together, you begin to see the
big picture, and what's missing.
Analysis is like art. It is “the ability to
correlate information within [a mental] database
and come up with tentative conclusions.”
As we stated
above, some fifteen percent of the respondents
said or implied that analysis is a process
where one “converts information into
actionable intelligence.” Below are some
samples.
Sample Responses
for “Converts Information into Actionable
Intelligence”
Analysis is converting data into
information.
Analysis is deriving some meaning from data.
Analysis is “The process of taking seemingly
unconnected pieces of information and turning
them into intelligence.”
Analysis is turning information into
intelligence.
Approximately
six percent of the respondents said or implied
that analysis is a process where one asks, or
answers, the “So What?” question. Below are
some examples of these responses.
Sample Responses for “So What?”
The
analysis process is asking the question: “So
What?”
Analysis is
answering the “So What?” question.
Analysis is
looking at information and determining what it
means and what should be done about it.
Conclusion
We hope the above discussion gives you
some idea of how Strategic Intelligence
professionals view the analysis process. While
there were responses that could fit into more
than one category, our goal was to put each
opinion into one category. We attempted to
extract the essence of an opinion, then
categorize the opinion. In general, the
examples we show above do not represent the
full text of a given comment.
Although
some of the opinions on analysis differed at
some level, we found that, for the most part,
there was commonality among the different
opinions. Most business analysis professionals
believe that the goal of business analysis is
to come up with intelligence that can help a
company better meet its strategic
objectives.